Extract:
Aromatherapy, Fact or Fiction?
For years, aromatherapy has been touted as a safe and natural way to relax and even heal. Essential oils from a variety of scents have been added to candles and sprays to help people feel better. However, a recent study performed at Ohio State University says that these smells, as nice as they may be, do not do a thing to improve people’s health.
To find out if aromatherapy actually works, the researchers tested two of the most popular scents: lemon and lavender. First, test subjects had their heart rate, blood pressure, stress hormones, and immune function measured and noted. Next, they were subjected to mild stress-ors and then told to sniff one of the scents to see if the scent would help them to relax. Finally, all the subjects were tested again to look for improvement. No significant changes were noted, even in people who had previously stated they were true believers in the power of aromatherapy.
Of course, this does not necessarily prove that aromatherapy is worthless, either. It was just one small study, pitted against the opinions of thousands of consumers who swear by peppermint on their pillow for an upset stomach or vanilla for a headache. More tests will be done, but in the meantime, a whiff of lavender, lemon, or other scents will certainly do no harm, and can be quite pleasant at the same time.
Identify the overall tone of the essay.
-
A
Congratulatory
-
B
Uncertain
-
C
Annoyed
-
D
Distressed
The overall tone is uncertain, reflecting balanced presentation of conflicting evidence without definitive conclusions.
A) Congratulatory
No achievements are celebrated. Study results are presented neutrally rather than triumphantly, and believers' experiences aren't dismissed, preventing congratulatory tone.
B) Uncertain
The tone consistently reflects ambiguity: the study "does not necessarily prove that aromatherapy is worthless," it's "just one small study" against thousands of believers, and "More tests will be done." The author avoids definitive conclusions, maintaining open-minded neutrality throughout.
C) Annoyed
No irritation appears toward either believers or researchers. The presentation remains balanced and respectful of both perspectives without frustration or impatience.
D) Distressed
No anxiety or upset is evident. The author calmly acknowledges conflicting evidence and concludes scents "will certainly do no harm", showing comfort with uncertainty rather than distress.
Conclusion
Tone analysis requires evaluating emotional quality across an entire passage. The consistent acknowledgment of limited evidence, respect for contrary viewpoints, and explicit call for further research create an overall tone of thoughtful uncertainty rather than certainty, frustration, or celebration.