HESI READING COMPREHENSION PRACTICE EXAM
This practice exam provides a full-length reading comprehension experience aligned with HESI A2 standards. It allows students to test their ability to understand, analyze, and apply information from a variety of passages, helping to build confidence and mastery.
Topics Covered
Main Idea
Supporting Details
Inference
Contextual Meaning
Author’s Intent
00:00
Extract:
Obsession Plus Addiction It is hard to imagine how the eating disorders anorexia and bulimia could be any worse than they already are, but somehow people have found a way. Known unofficially as drunkorexia, this condition is a blend of self imposed starvation or binging and purging mixed with alcohol abuse. Anorexics use alcohol either to soothe their conscience for eating something they feel they should not, or as their only sustenance. Bulimics binge on alcohol for emotional reasons and then purge by vomiting all of it back up. Our current culture’s obsession with thinness, coupled with widespread acceptance of drug and alcohol abuse, has made this combination particularly attractive. Dr. Doug Bunnell, former president of the National Eating Disorders Association, said, ‘Binge drinking is almost cool and hip, and losing weight and being thin is a cultural imperative for young women in America. Mixing both is not surprising, and it has reached a tipping point in terms of public awareness.’ Some experts are beginning to explore the possible psychological and neurological links between eating disorders and substance abuse. Does eating or binging somehow trigger the same pleasure centers as drugs or alcohol? Another avenue being explored is what to do if a person has both conditions. Treatment for addiction is abstinence, but no one can abstain completely from food. As Dr. Kevin Wandler, vice president for medical services at an eating disorders center, phrases it, ‘Eating normally would be an effective behavior, but it’s easier to give up alcohol and drugs because you never need them again. If your drug is food, that’s a challenge.’
Identify the overall tone of the essay.
A.
Dismayed
B. Fascinated
C. Reassured
D. Suspicious
Rationale
The overall tone of the essay is dismayed because the author expresses concern and alarm about the dangerous combination of eating disorders and alcohol abuse.
A. Dismayed
The author presents drunkorexia as an escalation of already serious conditions, describing it as "worse" than anorexia or bulimia alone. Words and phrases such as obsession with thinness, tipping point, and expert warnings convey worry rather than neutrality or optimism. The tone reflects unease about cultural values and public health consequences.
B. Fascinated
A fascinated tone would suggest curiosity, intrigue, or admiration. The author does not express wonder or interest for its own sake; instead, the discussion is framed around concern and risk.
C. Reassured
A reassuring tone would emphasize solutions, hope, or comfort. The passage offers no reassurance and instead highlights how difficult treatment is, especially when food itself is the addiction.
D. Suspicious
Suspicion implies doubt, accusation, or questioning motives. The author does not suggest conspiracies or hidden intentions, only documented behaviors and expert opinions.
Conclusion
The author's concern, warning language, and expert testimony clearly establish a dismayed tone, making Option A correct.
Extract:
Obsession Plus Addiction It is hard to imagine how the eating disorders anorexia and bulimia could be any worse than they already are, but somehow people have found a way. Known unofficially as drunkorexia, this condition is a blend of self imposed starvation or binging and purging mixed with alcohol abuse. Anorexics use alcohol either to soothe their conscience for eating something they feel they should not, or as their only sustenance. Bulimics binge on alcohol for emotional reasons and then purge by vomiting all of it back up. Our current culture’s obsession with thinness, coupled with widespread acceptance of drug and alcohol abuse, has made this combination particularly attractive. Dr. Doug Bunnell, former president of the National Eating Disorders Association, said, ‘Binge drinking is almost cool and hip, and losing weight and being thin is a cultural imperative for young women in America. Mixing both is not surprising, and it has reached a tipping point in terms of public awareness.’ Some experts are beginning to explore the possible psychological and neurological links between eating disorders and substance abuse. Does eating or binging somehow trigger the same pleasure centers as drugs or alcohol? Another avenue being explored is what to do if a person has both conditions. Treatment for addiction is abstinence, but no one can abstain completely from food. As Dr. Kevin Wandler, vice president for medical services at an eating disorders center, phrases it, ‘Eating normally would be an effective behavior, but it’s easier to give up alcohol and drugs because you never need them again. If your drug is food, that’s a challenge.’
What is the meaning of the word abstain as used in the last paragraph?
A.
Dishonor
B. Go without
C. Connect to
D. Liberate
Rationale
The word abstain means to go without or to refrain from something, as shown by the statement that no one can abstain completely from food.
A. Dishonor
Dishonor means to bring shame or disgrace. This meaning has no connection to eating, addiction, or behavior described in the passage.
B. Go without
This is the correct meaning. The sentence contrasts abstaining from drugs or alcohol with food, explaining that people must continue eating, even during recovery. "Go without" accurately matches this usage.
C. Connect to
This meaning suggests attachment or association, which is the opposite of abstaining and does not fit the context.
D. Liberate
Liberate means to free or release. While recovery might eventually feel liberating, this meaning does not align with the direct definition of abstain in the sentence.
Conclusion
In context, abstain clearly means to go without, so Option B is correct.
Extract:
Obsession Plus Addiction It is hard to imagine how the eating disorders anorexia and bulimia could be any worse than they already are, but somehow people have found a way. Known unofficially as drunkorexia, this condition is a blend of self imposed starvation or binging and purging mixed with alcohol abuse. Anorexics use alcohol either to soothe their conscience for eating something they feel they should not, or as their only sustenance. Bulimics binge on alcohol for emotional reasons and then purge by vomiting all of it back up. Our current culture’s obsession with thinness, coupled with widespread acceptance of drug and alcohol abuse, has made this combination particularly attractive. Dr. Doug Bunnell, former president of the National Eating Disorders Association, said, ‘Binge drinking is almost cool and hip, and losing weight and being thin is a cultural imperative for young women in America. Mixing both is not surprising, and it has reached a tipping point in terms of public awareness.’ Some experts are beginning to explore the possible psychological and neurological links between eating disorders and substance abuse. Does eating or binging somehow trigger the same pleasure centers as drugs or alcohol? Another avenue being explored is what to do if a person has both conditions. Treatment for addiction is abstinence, but no one can abstain completely from food. As Dr. Kevin Wandler, vice president for medical services at an eating disorders center, phrases it, ‘Eating normally would be an effective behavior, but it’s easier to give up alcohol and drugs because you never need them again. If your drug is food, that’s a challenge.’
Which of the following is not listed as a detail in the passage?
A.
Anorexics' use of alcohol as sustenance
B. Bulimics' use of alcohol for emotional reasons
C. Cultural reasons for drunkorexia
D. Medical cures for drunkorexia
Rationale
The passage does not list or describe any medical cures or treatments for drunkorexia.
A. Anorexics' use of alcohol as sustenance
This detail is directly stated. The passage explains that anorexics may use alcohol as their only source of sustenance.
B. Bulimics' use of alcohol for emotional reasons
This detail is explicitly mentioned. The author describes bulimics binge-drinking for emotional reasons and then purging.
C. Cultural reasons for drunkorexia
The passage clearly lists cultural influences, including the obsession with thinness and the normalization of binge drinking.
D. Medical cures for drunkorexia
No cures, medications, or treatment protocols are discussed. The passage focuses on causes, behaviors, and challenges, not solutions.
Conclusion
Because no medical cures are mentioned, Option D is the correct answer.
Extract:
Obsession Plus Addiction It is hard to imagine how the eating disorders anorexia and bulimia could be any worse than they already are, but somehow people have found a way. Known unofficially as drunkorexia, this condition is a blend of self imposed starvation or binging and purging mixed with alcohol abuse. Anorexics use alcohol either to soothe their conscience for eating something they feel they should not, or as their only sustenance. Bulimics binge on alcohol for emotional reasons and then purge by vomiting all of it back up. Our current culture’s obsession with thinness, coupled with widespread acceptance of drug and alcohol abuse, has made this combination particularly attractive. Dr. Doug Bunnell, former president of the National Eating Disorders Association, said, ‘Binge drinking is almost cool and hip, and losing weight and being thin is a cultural imperative for young women in America. Mixing both is not surprising, and it has reached a tipping point in terms of public awareness.’ Some experts are beginning to explore the possible psychological and neurological links between eating disorders and substance abuse. Does eating or binging somehow trigger the same pleasure centers as drugs or alcohol? Another avenue being explored is what to do if a person has both conditions. Treatment for addiction is abstinence, but no one can abstain completely from food. As Dr. Kevin Wandler, vice president for medical services at an eating disorders center, phrases it, ‘Eating normally would be an effective behavior, but it’s easier to give up alcohol and drugs because you never need them again. If your drug is food, that’s a challenge.’
What is the author's primary purpose in writing this essay?
A.
To inform
B. To persuade
C. To entertain
D. To analyze
Rationale
The author's primary purpose is to inform readers about drunkorexia, its causes, and the challenges it presents.
A. To inform
The essay defines drunkorexia, explains how it manifests in anorexics and bulimics, provides cultural context, and includes expert opinions. The tone remains explanatory rather than argumentative.
B. To persuade
Persuasion would involve urging readers to take action or adopt a viewpoint. The author does not advocate policy changes or direct reader behavior.
C. To entertain
There is no humor, storytelling, or narrative designed for enjoyment. The topic is serious and informational.
D. To analyze
While some expert commentary is included, the essay does not deeply break down data or conduct formal analysis. It primarily reports and explains.
Conclusion
The essay's purpose is clearly informational.
Extract:
Hypothermia in Infants Hypothermia is a condition in which the body loses heat faster than it produces heat. Someone your age may end up with hypothermia from being outside on a frosty day for hours without adequate warm clothing. An elderly person may develop the condition after sitting in an air conditioned room for a prolonged period of time. However, hypothermia in infants is the most common of all, and potentially the most dangerous. Infants lose body heat faster than adults do. They have a higher ratio of surface area (skin) to volume, so cold on the outside is more easily turned into cold on the inside, which can be dangerous. In addition, they are unable to use shivering to keep themselves warm, meaning that they burn fat instead. That fact can mean that a baby kept in cold temperatures will grow at a slower rate than a baby who is warm. Signs of hypothermia in infants include red skin (especially on the extremities) that is cold to the touch, low energy, weak crying, and failure to eat. The baby should be rewarmed and then kept in warmer clothing away from air conditioning or drafts. Carrying the baby next to the parent in a kangaroo style sling is one means of keeping him or her warm. When that is not possible, dressing the infant in a warm onesie with socks and a hat can suffice. Never cover a newborn with multiple blankets; instead, dress the baby appropriately to maintain a normal body temperature. New parents would be wise to remember that the newborn has spent nine months in a moist climate with temperatures ranging in the high 90s. Napping by the window on a pleasant 80 degree day can feel shockingly cold to that newborn.
Identify the overall tone of the essay.
A.
Annoyed
B. Respectful
C. Fascinated
D. Cautionary
Rationale
The overall tone of the essay is Cautionary.
A. Annoyed
The passage does not express irritation, frustration, or anger. The author provides guidance calmly and systematically.
B. Respectful
The tone maintains a neutral and advisory quality but does not emphasize deference or formality. The focus is on safety and awareness rather than politeness.
C. Fascinated
The passage does not convey excitement, wonder, or curiosity. The writing is oriented toward practical information and alerting parents.
D. Cautionary
The author warns parents about the dangers of hypothermia, describes risk factors, lists warning signs, and provides steps to prevent harm. The essay seeks to keep infants safe through guidance and caution.
Conclusion
The repeated emphasis on alerting caregivers and providing preventive strategies establishes a cautionary tone, making D. Cautionary the best choice.
Extract:
Hypothermia in Infants Hypothermia is a condition in which the body loses heat faster than it produces heat. Someone your age may end up with hypothermia from being outside on a frosty day for hours without adequate warm clothing. An elderly person may develop the condition after sitting in an air conditioned room for a prolonged period of time. However, hypothermia in infants is the most common of all, and potentially the most dangerous. Infants lose body heat faster than adults do. They have a higher ratio of surface area (skin) to volume, so cold on the outside is more easily turned into cold on the inside, which can be dangerous. In addition, they are unable to use shivering to keep themselves warm, meaning that they burn fat instead. That fact can mean that a baby kept in cold temperatures will grow at a slower rate than a baby who is warm. Signs of hypothermia in infants include red skin (especially on the extremities) that is cold to the touch, low energy, weak crying, and failure to eat. The baby should be rewarmed and then kept in warmer clothing away from air conditioning or drafts. Carrying the baby next to the parent in a kangaroo style sling is one means of keeping him or her warm. When that is not possible, dressing the infant in a warm onesie with socks and a hat can suffice. Never cover a newborn with multiple blankets; instead, dress the baby appropriately to maintain a normal body temperature. New parents would be wise to remember that the newborn has spent nine months in a moist climate with temperatures ranging in the high 90s. Napping by the window on a pleasant 80 degree day can feel shockingly cold to that newborn.
Which of the following is not listed as a detail in the passage?
A.
Elderly people are also prone to hypothermia.
B. Blue lips are one sign that a child is too cold.
C. Slings are one means of keeping small babies warm.
D. You should never put a baby under heavy blankets.
Rationale
The detail that is not listed in the passage is Blue lips are one sign that a child is too cold.
A. Elderly people are also prone to hypothermia
The essay mentions that older adults may develop hypothermia after prolonged exposure to cold air, demonstrating that infants are not the only vulnerable group.
B. Blue lips are one sign that a child is too cold
Red skin, cold extremities, low energy, weak crying, and failure to eat are cited as warning signs, but blue lips are not mentioned anywhere.
C. Slings are one means of keeping small babies warm
A kangaroo-style sling is described as a safe and practical method to maintain an infant's warmth.
D. You should never put a baby under heavy blankets
The essay advises against using multiple blankets and recommends dressing the baby appropriately to keep body temperature normal.
Conclusion
Since blue lips are never mentioned among hypothermia signs, B is the option that does not appear in the passage.
Extract:
Hypothermia in Infants Hypothermia is a condition in which the body loses heat faster than it produces heat. Someone your age may end up with hypothermia from being outside on a frosty day for hours without adequate warm clothing. An elderly person may develop the condition after sitting in an air conditioned room for a prolonged period of time. However, hypothermia in infants is the most common of all, and potentially the most dangerous. Infants lose body heat faster than adults do. They have a higher ratio of surface area (skin) to volume, so cold on the outside is more easily turned into cold on the inside, which can be dangerous. In addition, they are unable to use shivering to keep themselves warm, meaning that they burn fat instead. That fact can mean that a baby kept in cold temperatures will grow at a slower rate than a baby who is warm. Signs of hypothermia in infants include red skin (especially on the extremities) that is cold to the touch, low energy, weak crying, and failure to eat. The baby should be rewarmed and then kept in warmer clothing away from air conditioning or drafts. Carrying the baby next to the parent in a kangaroo style sling is one means of keeping him or her warm. When that is not possible, dressing the infant in a warm onesie with socks and a hat can suffice. Never cover a newborn with multiple blankets; instead, dress the baby appropriately to maintain a normal body temperature. New parents would be wise to remember that the newborn has spent nine months in a moist climate with temperatures ranging in the high 90s. Napping by the window on a pleasant 80 degree day can feel shockingly cold to that newborn.
The word suffice, as used in paragraph 3, most closely means
A.
oversee
B. make sure of
C. be enough
D. check up on
Rationale
The word suffice, as used in paragraph 3, most closely means be enough.
A. oversee
Oversee refers to supervising or managing something, which does not relate to the adequacy of clothing for warmth.
B. make sure of
Make sure of implies verifying or ensuring an action occurs, which differs from simply being sufficient.
C. be enough
Suffice describes the method of dressing an infant in a warm onesie, socks, and a hat as adequate to maintain body temperature. It conveys that this approach meets the requirement without needing extra measures.
D. check up on
Check up on suggests monitoring or inspecting, which does not match the context of sufficiency in maintaining warmth.
Conclusion
Suffice conveys adequacy and being sufficient for keeping the infant warm, making C. be enough the accurate meaning.
Extract:
Underage Drinkers and TV Ads A recent study from Johns Hopkins indicates a strong correlation between television advertising for alcohol and the drinking behavior of underage youth. It appears that young people are three times more likely to drink brands they see advertised on television compared to other brands, regardless of price or other factors. The study has many calling for a reduction of exposure of young people to alcohol advertising, just as people insisted on removal of cigarette advertising from television back in 1970. In that year, the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act banned any such ads on radio or television and required stronger health warnings on packaging. Will the current study lead to a similar ban for alcohol? It would be a hard sell for the television industry. Right now, it is estimated that close to half of all ads teenagers see on television are for alcohol. In the first four months of 2014 alone, Bud Light spent $84.3 million on television ads, and the beer industry as a whole spent close to half a billion. At present, the only regulation on alcohol advertising is self regulation. Many beer companies and vodka manufacturers include ads urging moderation. However, the message that young people receive, despite the industry’s seemingly good intentions, is that buying that brand is a good idea. Earlier studies have shown that exposure to alcohol advertising increases the likelihood that young people will drink. This study expands on that by showing that what they will drink is motivated by the ads themselves. Young people are brand conscious, and given the choice, they will go with the brand that they have seen associated with people or images that appeal to them.
Author's primary purpose in the alcohol ad essay is to
A.
inform
B. entertain
C. reflect
D. persuade
Rationale
The author's primary purpose is to persuade readers to reduce alcohol consumption.
A) inform
While the essay includes factual information about alcohol's health effects and public health legislation, these facts serve to support an argument rather than to present a neutral report. The emphasis is on motivating readers to take specific actions, so mere information delivery is not the primary aim.
B) entertain
There is no use of humor, storytelling, anecdotes, or dramatization to amuse or engage readers in an entertaining way. The essay focuses on advocacy and guidance rather than amusement.
C) reflect
Reflective writing usually involves personal insight, introspection, or exploration of one's thoughts and feelings. The passage does not explore the author's personal experience or offer contemplative commentary; it is advocacy-oriented.
D) persuade
The essay argues for moderation in alcohol consumption, citing the harmful effects of alcohol and drawing parallels with tobacco control laws. By presenting evidence and advocating behavioral change, the passage clearly seeks to influence readers' attitudes and actions, which is the hallmark of persuasion.
Conclusion
The essay aims to convince readers to adopt healthier behaviors, making D) persuade the author's primary purpose.
Extract:
Underage Drinkers and TV Ads A recent study from Johns Hopkins indicates a strong correlation between television advertising for alcohol and the drinking behavior of underage youth. It appears that young people are three times more likely to drink brands they see advertised on television compared to other brands, regardless of price or other factors. The study has many calling for a reduction of exposure of young people to alcohol advertising, just as people insisted on removal of cigarette advertising from television back in 1970. In that year, the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act banned any such ads on radio or television and required stronger health warnings on packaging. Will the current study lead to a similar ban for alcohol? It would be a hard sell for the television industry. Right now, it is estimated that close to half of all ads teenagers see on television are for alcohol. In the first four months of 2014 alone, Bud Light spent $84.3 million on television ads, and the beer industry as a whole spent close to half a billion. At present, the only regulation on alcohol advertising is self regulation. Many beer companies and vodka manufacturers include ads urging moderation. However, the message that young people receive, despite the industry’s seemingly good intentions, is that buying that brand is a good idea. Earlier studies have shown that exposure to alcohol advertising increases the likelihood that young people will drink. This study expands on that by showing that what they will drink is motivated by the ads themselves. Young people are brand conscious, and given the choice, they will go with the brand that they have seen associated with people or images that appeal to them.
Which is not mentioned as a result of the 1970 Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act?
A.
Banning radio ads
B. Banning print ads
C. Banning TV ads
D. Requiring stronger warnings
Rationale
The outcome not mentioned in the passage is banning print ads.
A) Banning radio ads
The act explicitly prohibited cigarette advertisements on radio, which is clearly stated in the text.
B) Banning print ads
Print advertising was not affected by this legislation; the law focused solely on electronic media such as radio and television. Including print ads as banned is therefore inaccurate according to the passage.
C) Banning TV ads
Television advertising for cigarettes was banned under the act, and this is explicitly mentioned in the passage.
D) Requiring stronger warnings
The act required cigarette packages to carry more prominent health warnings, which is noted in the passage.
Conclusion
Since the passage only references radio and television advertising bans and stronger health warnings, B) banning print ads is the correct answer.
Extract:
Underage Drinkers and TV Ads A recent study from Johns Hopkins indicates a strong correlation between television advertising for alcohol and the drinking behavior of underage youth. It appears that young people are three times more likely to drink brands they see advertised on television compared to other brands, regardless of price or other factors. The study has many calling for a reduction of exposure of young people to alcohol advertising, just as people insisted on removal of cigarette advertising from television back in 1970. In that year, the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act banned any such ads on radio or television and required stronger health warnings on packaging. Will the current study lead to a similar ban for alcohol? It would be a hard sell for the television industry. Right now, it is estimated that close to half of all ads teenagers see on television are for alcohol. In the first four months of 2014 alone, Bud Light spent $84.3 million on television ads, and the beer industry as a whole spent close to half a billion. At present, the only regulation on alcohol advertising is self regulation. Many beer companies and vodka manufacturers include ads urging moderation. However, the message that young people receive, despite the industry’s seemingly good intentions, is that buying that brand is a good idea. Earlier studies have shown that exposure to alcohol advertising increases the likelihood that young people will drink. This study expands on that by showing that what they will drink is motivated by the ads themselves. Young people are brand conscious, and given the choice, they will go with the brand that they have seen associated with people or images that appeal to them.
The word moderation in paragraph 4 means
A.
normality
B. compromise
C. calmness
D. self restraint
Rationale
In the context of the essay, moderation means self restraint.
A) normality
Normality refers to average or typical behavior, which does not involve deliberately limiting alcohol consumption. It fails to capture the idea of actively controlling one's intake.
B) compromise
Compromise implies negotiation or making a mutual adjustment between parties, which is unrelated to personal control over drinking.
C) calmness
Calmness describes a state of emotional tranquility and does not relate to restricting alcohol use.
D) self restraint
The passage states that ads "urge moderation," which is intended to advise readers to drink sparingly and exercise discipline. Self restraint precisely reflects the idea of voluntarily limiting consumption for health and safety reasons.
Conclusion
Moderation in this context is about conscious control of behavior, making D) self restraint the most accurate interpretation.
Extract:
Underage Drinkers and TV Ads A recent study from Johns Hopkins indicates a strong correlation between television advertising for alcohol and the drinking behavior of underage youth. It appears that young people are three times more likely to drink brands they see advertised on television compared to other brands, regardless of price or other factors. The study has many calling for a reduction of exposure of young people to alcohol advertising, just as people insisted on removal of cigarette advertising from television back in 1970. In that year, the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act banned any such ads on radio or television and required stronger health warnings on packaging. Will the current study lead to a similar ban for alcohol? It would be a hard sell for the television industry. Right now, it is estimated that close to half of all ads teenagers see on television are for alcohol. In the first four months of 2014 alone, Bud Light spent $84.3 million on television ads, and the beer industry as a whole spent close to half a billion. At present, the only regulation on alcohol advertising is self regulation. Many beer companies and vodka manufacturers include ads urging moderation. However, the message that young people receive, despite the industry’s seemingly good intentions, is that buying that brand is a good idea. Earlier studies have shown that exposure to alcohol advertising increases the likelihood that young people will drink. This study expands on that by showing that what they will drink is motivated by the ads themselves. Young people are brand conscious, and given the choice, they will go with the brand that they have seen associated with people or images that appeal to them.
Main idea of the alcohol ad passage?
A.
Young adults drink more while watching TV
B. The brands young people drink are driven by the ads they see
C. Banning beer ads will prevent underage drinking
D. Liquor ads should be banned just as cigarette ads once were
Rationale
The main idea of the passage is "The brands young people drink are driven by the ads they see."
A) Young adults drink more while watching TV
The passage does not measure the amount of alcohol consumed by youth while watching television. It focuses solely on brand choice and the influence of advertisements on which brands are selected. Using this as the main idea misrepresents the study's findings.
B) The brands young people drink are driven by the ads they see
This captures the central finding of the study: young people are three times more likely to consume alcohol brands that are advertised on television. It emphasizes the effect of advertising on brand preference, which is the primary point the passage communicates.
C) Banning beer ads will prevent underage drinking
The passage mentions calls for reduced exposure to alcohol advertising but does not claim that banning ads will completely prevent underage drinking. This is a suggested implication, not a statement of fact or the main idea.
D) Liquor ads should be banned just as cigarette ads once were
While the passage references the 1970 ban on cigarette ads, it does not advocate explicitly for banning alcohol ads. The main idea revolves around the study findings, not policy prescriptions.
Conclusion
The passage emphasizes the influence of advertising on brand choice among youth, making B) The brands young people drink are driven by the ads they see the most accurate main idea.
Extract:
Underage Drinkers and TV Ads A recent study from Johns Hopkins indicates a strong correlation between television advertising for alcohol and the drinking behavior of underage youth. It appears that young people are three times more likely to drink brands they see advertised on television compared to other brands, regardless of price or other factors. The study has many calling for a reduction of exposure of young people to alcohol advertising, just as people insisted on removal of cigarette advertising from television back in 1970. In that year, the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act banned any such ads on radio or television and required stronger health warnings on packaging. Will the current study lead to a similar ban for alcohol? It would be a hard sell for the television industry. Right now, it is estimated that close to half of all ads teenagers see on television are for alcohol. In the first four months of 2014 alone, Bud Light spent $84.3 million on television ads, and the beer industry as a whole spent close to half a billion. At present, the only regulation on alcohol advertising is self regulation. Many beer companies and vodka manufacturers include ads urging moderation. However, the message that young people receive, despite the industry’s seemingly good intentions, is that buying that brand is a good idea. Earlier studies have shown that exposure to alcohol advertising increases the likelihood that young people will drink. This study expands on that by showing that what they will drink is motivated by the ads themselves. Young people are brand conscious, and given the choice, they will go with the brand that they have seen associated with people or images that appeal to them.
Which would not be inferred by the reader?
A.
Only beer advertising has an ill effect on young viewers
B. Young people seem extremely brand conscious
C. The TV industry would likely fight a ban on alcohol ads
D. Cigarette ads do not appear on American television
Rationale
The statement that "Only beer advertising has an ill effect on young viewers" cannot be inferred from the passage.
A) Only beer advertising has an ill effect on young viewers
The passage discusses the effect of alcohol advertising generally, not just beer. It never specifies that only beer ads influence underage viewers, so this conclusion cannot be drawn.
B) Young people seem extremely brand conscious
The passage explicitly states that "Young people are brand conscious, and given the choice, they will go with the brand that they have seen associated with people or images that appeal to them." This is directly supported.
C) The TV industry would likely fight a ban on alcohol ads
The text mentions the massive spending on alcohol advertisements and notes the economic stakes. It is reasonable to infer that the TV industry would resist any restrictions on these lucrative ads.
D) Cigarette ads do not appear on American television
The passage states that the 1970 Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act banned cigarette advertising on radio and television. This is a factual statement that is easily verified.
Conclusion
Option A) Only beer advertising has an ill effect on young viewers cannot be inferred from the passage.
Extract:
Studies conducted on numerous kindergarten programs across the country have revealed eye-opening evidence that today's kindergarten curriculum looks more like the curriculum taught in first grade classrooms thirty years ago.
What is the main idea of the above sentence?
A.
What kindergarten is
B. How kindergarten has changed
C. What students learn in kindergarten
D. What the kindergarten curriculum is
Rationale
The main idea of the sentence is how kindergarten has changed.
The main idea of a sentence is the most important point it conveys. This sentence presents a finding from studies: a comparison between "today's kindergarten curriculum" and the "first grade curriculum... thirty years ago." The key elements are a present state ("today's"), a past benchmark ("thirty years ago"), and a comparative conclusion ("looks more like"). The core thrust is not just defining kindergarten or its curriculum, but explicitly describing a transformation or shift over time in its academic rigor and content.
A) What kindergarten is: This option seeks a definition or essential description of kindergarten. The sentence does not define kindergarten; it assumes the reader knows what kindergarten is and instead makes a claim about its evolution. It provides no information on kindergarten's purpose, duration, or fundamental characteristics, focusing solely on a change in its academic content.
B) How kindergarten has changed: This is correct. The sentence is built around a comparative structure that highlights a difference across time. The phrase "looks more like the curriculum taught in first grade classrooms thirty years ago" is a direct statement of change. It indicates that the kindergarten experience has shifted, becoming more academically advanced relative to a historical standard. The main idea is precisely this documented transformation.
C) What students learn in kindergarten: This option asks for the specific content of the curriculum. While the sentence implies that the content is more advanced, it does not list any specific subjects, skills, or topics that kindergarteners learn (e.g., letters, numbers, shapes). It only states that whatever they learn now is comparable to what older first-graders learned, leaving the actual "what" undefined.
D) What the kindergarten curriculum is: This choice is similar to C but focuses on the formal "curriculum" itself. Again, the sentence does not describe the components, standards, or objectives of the current curriculum. It describes its relationship to a past curriculum ("more like"), which is a statement about its relative nature or difficulty, not its intrinsic contents.
Conclusion:
The sentence's power lies in its historical comparison, revealing a shift in educational expectations. It communicates that kindergarten is not what it once was, emphasizing the nature of the change rather than a static description. Therefore, the main idea is best summarized as B) How kindergarten has changed.
Extract:
Studies conducted on numerous kindergarten programs across the country have revealed eye-opening evidence that today's kindergarten curriculum looks more like the curriculum taught in first grade classrooms thirty years ago.
Imagine this sentence is a supporting detail in a well-developed paragraph. Which of the following sentences would best function as a topic sentence?
A.
The curriculum seen in today's kindergarten classrooms may not be developmentally appropriate for children.
B. Teaching styles have changed dramatically over the course of the last thirty years.
C. Play-based learning is still a big part of today's kindergarten classrooms.
D. Studies have shown that national-based standards lead to more success in the classroom.
Rationale
The sentence about curriculum not being developmentally appropriate would best function as a topic sentence.
A topic sentence must present a broad, arguable claim that the supporting details, including the given sentence, can explain or prove. The given sentence provides evidence of a specific change: increased academic rigor in kindergarten. For it to function as strong support, the topic sentence should establish a context or argument where this evidence is relevant, likely a discussion about the implications, causes, or value of this change. The best topic sentence would use this evidence to build a larger point about contemporary kindergarten education.
A) The curriculum seen in today's kindergarten classrooms may not be developmentally appropriate for children.: This is an excellent topic sentence for the provided detail. It presents a debatable opinion (the curriculum may be inappropriate) that directly connects to the evidence of increased academic demands. The given sentence supports this by showing how the curriculum has changed (it now resembles old first-grade work), which can be used as factual groundwork to argue that such work is too advanced for typical kindergarten-aged children. The detail provides the "what" to support the topic sentence's "so what?"
B) Teaching styles have changed dramatically over the course of the last thirty years.: This topic sentence shifts the focus from curriculum content to instructional methods. The given sentence is about what is taught (the curriculum), not about how it is taught (teaching styles such as lecture, group work, or technology use). While related, these are distinct concepts. The detail about curriculum rigor does not effectively support a claim about evolving pedagogical techniques; it would be a tangential piece of evidence at best.
C) Play-based learning is still a big part of today's kindergarten classrooms.: This topic sentence actually contradicts the implication of the supporting detail. The detail suggests kindergarten has become more academically rigorous, like past first grade, which often implies a reduction in unstructured playtime. If the topic sentence argues that play remains a big part, the given detail would be a counterpoint or conflicting evidence, not a supporting one. A supporting detail should align with and bolster the topic sentence's claim.
D) Studies have shown that national-based standards lead to more success in the classroom.: This topic sentence introduces the concept of "national-based standards" as a cause for success. The given detail makes no mention of standards, their origin, or their outcomes. It only describes an outcome (a changed curriculum). To connect, the paragraph would need additional bridging sentences to argue that national standards caused this change and that the change constitutes "success." The detail alone does not directly support this causal chain.
Conclusion:
The given sentence serves as concrete evidence of a curriculum shift. The topic sentence A) The curriculum seen in today's kindergarten classrooms may not be developmentally appropriate for children effectively uses this evidence as the foundation for a critical argument about modern education, making it the most logical and cohesive choice.
Extract:
Studies conducted on numerous kindergarten programs across the country have revealed eye-opening evidence that today's kindergarten curriculum looks more like the curriculum taught in first grade classrooms thirty years ago.
Imagine this sentence is the topic sentence of a well-developed paragraph. Which of the following sentences would best function as a supporting detail?
A.
Some students enter kindergarten with a rich nursery school experience while others enter the school environment for the first time in their lives.
B. Kindergarten is a German word that literally means "a garden for children."
C. While kindergarteners from years ago only needed to begin to learn basic concepts of print in reading, today's kindergarteners are expected to be at an E reading level when leaving the classroom.
D. Kindergarten is the time when children acquire the necessary early educational skills to prepare them to be full-fledged students who are ready for first grade.
Rationale
The sentence contrasting past and present reading expectations would best function as a supporting detail.
A supporting detail must provide specific evidence, examples, or explanation that directly elaborates on the claim made in the topic sentence. The topic sentence claims that today's kindergarten curriculum is more advanced, resembling past first-grade work. An effective supporting detail would offer a concrete, specific comparison between past and present expectations to illustrate and prove this general claim.
A) Some students enter kindergarten with a rich nursery school experience while others enter the school environment for the first time in their lives.: This sentence discusses the varying preparatory backgrounds of children entering kindergarten. It is about student readiness, not about the curriculum itself. While disparities in readiness might be a consequence or a related issue, this detail does not provide evidence for how the curriculum has changed. It shifts the focus to the students rather than the academic content.
B) Kindergarten is a German word that literally means "a garden for children.": This is a piece of etymological trivia about the origin of the word "kindergarten." It provides historical context for the name but offers no information about curriculum changes over the last thirty years. It is completely irrelevant to the topic sentence's claim about increased academic rigor and would not help develop the paragraph's argument.
C) While kindergarteners from years ago only needed to begin to learn basic concepts of print in reading, today's kindergarteners are expected to be at an E reading level when leaving the classroom.: This is the ideal supporting detail. It follows the exact comparative structure of the topic sentence ("years ago" vs. "today") and provides a specific, measurable example of the change. "Basic concepts of print" (e.g., knowing how to hold a book) is a foundational skill, while an "E reading level" signifies independent reading of simple texts, a skill once expected in first grade. This vividly illustrates and substantiates the topic sentence's claim.
D) Kindergarten is the time when children acquire the necessary early educational skills to prepare them to be full-fledged students who are ready for first grade.: This is a general definition of kindergarten's purpose. It does not contrast past and present, nor does it provide evidence that the skills taught now are more advanced. It simply states what kindergarten has always aimed to do: prepare children for first grade. It does not support the specific claim that the preparation now involves first-grade-level work from the past.
Conclusion:
To support a topic sentence about curricular intensification, a detail must offer a clear, specific example of that intensification. Sentence C) does this perfectly by contrasting past and present literacy expectations, providing tangible proof for the broad claim, making it the best supporting detail.
Extract:
Our survey revealed some eye- opening results about young people and the role technology plays in their lives: technology is the primary focus of young people today. In our survey, 85% of those questioned said they spend their free time using technology in some way. Only 5% claim that they read actual books, 7% hang out with friends, and only 3% do some sort of physical activity. Whether it's looking through social media sites, playing video games, texting friends, or surfing the web, our youth spends an inordinate amount of time on screens. The days of hanging with friends, being outside in nature, and reading a good book for fun seem to be long gone. Natalie Greenburg, clinical psychologist from the Perkins Institute, claims that, "Studies have shown a direct correlation between too much screen time and rising depression rates among teens." Greenburg explains screen time has an impact on how individuals view themselves. This is based on the amount of likes someone gets on social media sites or the number of texts someone receives from his or her peers. "The feedback kids get from technology becomes the barometer for their self- worth, which could lead to depression." Cyber bullying is also a big issue with technology. "Kids are able to freely say anything they want behind a screen," Greenburg states,"Since they are bullying from a keyboard, kids are no longer exposed to social cues like facial expressions and body language, which may stop the behavior. As a result, cyber bullying has become rampant, which has led to more depression." Technology is here to stay and it is only going to become more entrenched in our society. It will continue to impact our youth in ways we can't even fathom.
What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A.
To inform
B. To caution
C. To persuade
D. To entertain
Rationale
The primary purpose of the passage is to inform.
An author's primary purpose is the fundamental intent behind the writing. This passage presents statistical data ("85%," "5%," "7%," "3%"), quotes an expert (Natalie Greenburg), and describes observed trends and potential consequences (impact on self-worth, cyberbullying, depression). The tone is expository and reportorial; it assembles and presents information about the relationship between youth and technology. While the information may have a cautionary undertone, the passage does not directly call the reader to a specific action or try to strongly convince them of a debatable opinion. Its main drive is to relay findings and expert analysis.
A) To inform: This is correct. The passage is structured like a summary of survey results and expert commentary. It seeks to educate the reader about the prevalence of technology use among youth and its associated psychological and social effects, as understood through research and observation.
B) To caution: A cautionary purpose aims to warn the reader about dangers or negative outcomes to encourage prudence. While the passage discusses negative correlates like depression and cyberbullying, it presents them as reported findings rather than as a direct warning. The language is more descriptive ("has become rampant," "could lead to") than prescriptive ("you must," "be careful"). The final paragraph is resigned ("Technology is here to stay") rather than urgent.
C) To persuade: A persuasive purpose aims to change the reader's mind or motivate them to adopt a belief or action. The passage lacks a clear call to action, argumentative structure, or overt appeals to the reader's emotions to convince them of a particular stance. It reports what a survey and an expert say without explicitly arguing for a policy change, behavioral shift, or specific viewpoint.
D) To entertain: The passage deals with a serious, research-based topic and uses a formal, report-like tone. There is no use of humor, narrative storytelling, or creative language designed to amuse or engage the reader for pleasure. Its content and style are informational, not entertaining.
Conclusion:
The passage functions primarily as a vehicle to convey data and expert insights on a contemporary issue. Therefore, its primary purpose is A) To inform.
Extract:
Our survey revealed some eye- opening results about young people and the role technology plays in their lives: technology is the primary focus of young people today. In our survey, 85% of those questioned said they spend their free time using technology in some way. Only 5% claim that they read actual books, 7% hang out with friends, and only 3% do some sort of physical activity. Whether it's looking through social media sites, playing video games, texting friends, or surfing the web, our youth spends an inordinate amount of time on screens. The days of hanging with friends, being outside in nature, and reading a good book for fun seem to be long gone. Natalie Greenburg, clinical psychologist from the Perkins Institute, claims that, "Studies have shown a direct correlation between too much screen time and rising depression rates among teens." Greenburg explains screen time has an impact on how individuals view themselves. This is based on the amount of likes someone gets on social media sites or the number of texts someone receives from his or her peers. "The feedback kids get from technology becomes the barometer for their self- worth, which could lead to depression." Cyber bullying is also a big issue with technology. "Kids are able to freely say anything they want behind a screen," Greenburg states,"Since they are bullying from a keyboard, kids are no longer exposed to social cues like facial expressions and body language, which may stop the behavior. As a result, cyber bullying has become rampant, which has led to more depression." Technology is here to stay and it is only going to become more entrenched in our society. It will continue to impact our youth in ways we can't even fathom.
With which statement would the author of the passage most likely agree with?
A.
Technology is having a negative impact on our youth.
B. Technology will become eventually become obsolete.
C. Technology will change for the better in the near future.
D. Technology provides our youth with endless possibilities.
Rationale
The author would most likely agree that technology is having a negative impact on youth.
Determining what an author would likely agree with requires inferring their viewpoint from the content and emphasis of the passage. The author selects and presents information that overwhelmingly highlights problems: high usage statistics displacing other activities, expert testimony linking screen time to depression and low self-worth, and a discussion of rampant cyberbullying. The neutral opening ("primary focus") quickly gives way to a negative framing ("inordinate amount of time," "long gone," "big issue," "rampant"). The author does not present counterarguments or positive effects of technology.
A) Technology is having a negative impact on our youth.: This is strongly supported by the passage. The author dedicates the majority of the text to detailing negative consequences: displacement of traditional activities, correlation with depression, impacts on self-worth, and the rise of cyberbullying. The chosen evidence and quoted expert both emphasize harm.
B) Technology will become eventually become obsolete.: The passage directly contradicts this. The final paragraph states, "Technology is here to stay and it is only going to become more entrenched in our society." The author explicitly argues technology's presence is permanent and growing, not fading away.
C) Technology will change for the better in the near future.: There is no discussion in the passage about future technological improvements or their potential benefits. The focus is on current impacts, and the final sentence suggests future impacts are unknown ("ways we can't even fathom") but does not characterize them as positive. The overall pessimistic tone makes an optimistic prediction unlikely.
D) Technology provides our youth with endless possibilities.: This is a positive statement that is not supported by the passage. The author mentions possibilities only in the context of negative behaviors ("freely say anything") and unknown future impacts. The "possibilities" highlighted are for increased screen time and its associated problems, not for creativity, learning, or connection.
Conclusion:
By focusing exclusively on statistics and expert analysis that underscore problems like depression, cyberbullying, and the displacement of healthy activities, the author reveals a concerned perspective. The author would most likely agree that A) Technology is having a negative impact on our youth.
Extract:
Our survey revealed some eye- opening results about young people and the role technology plays in their lives: technology is the primary focus of young people today. In our survey, 85% of those questioned said they spend their free time using technology in some way. Only 5% claim that they read actual books, 7% hang out with friends, and only 3% do some sort of physical activity. Whether it's looking through social media sites, playing video games, texting friends, or surfing the web, our youth spends an inordinate amount of time on screens. The days of hanging with friends, being outside in nature, and reading a good book for fun seem to be long gone. Natalie Greenburg, clinical psychologist from the Perkins Institute, claims that, "Studies have shown a direct correlation between too much screen time and rising depression rates among teens." Greenburg explains screen time has an impact on how individuals view themselves. This is based on the amount of likes someone gets on social media sites or the number of texts someone receives from his or her peers. "The feedback kids get from technology becomes the barometer for their self- worth, which could lead to depression." Cyber bullying is also a big issue with technology. "Kids are able to freely say anything they want behind a screen," Greenburg states,"Since they are bullying from a keyboard, kids are no longer exposed to social cues like facial expressions and body language, which may stop the behavior. As a result, cyber bullying has become rampant, which has led to more depression." Technology is here to stay and it is only going to become more entrenched in our society. It will continue to impact our youth in ways we can't even fathom.
Which sentence would express an additional effective reason to support the main idea of this passage?
A.
Every teacher feels technology is getting in the way of classroom learning.
B. A recent screen time study shows that technology use has risen since it is available in so many forms.
C. Everyone feels young people have no hope since they are too dependent on technology.
D. All young people know they are more technologically savvy than their parents will ever be.
Rationale
A recent study showing technology use has risen would be an effective supporting reason.
The main idea of the passage is that technology is the primary, pervasive focus of young people's lives, with significant negative consequences. An effective supporting reason would be a factual, verifiable piece of evidence that reinforces either the pervasiveness of the trend or its negative outcomes. It should be objective and credible, aligning with the passage's use of surveys and expert testimony.
A) Every teacher feels technology is getting in the way of classroom learning.: This is an overgeneralization ("Every teacher feels") and presents an opinion, not a verifiable fact. While it relates to a potential negative impact, its absolutist language and subjective nature make it a weak and less effective piece of support compared to a documented study.
B) A recent screen time study shows that technology use has risen since it is available in so many forms.: This is an excellent supporting reason. It provides objective, research-based evidence that directly reinforces the passage's opening claim about technology being the "primary focus." Showing that use is rising and attributing it to widespread availability strengthens the argument about its entrenched and growing role. It matches the passage's style of using data and studies.
C) Everyone feels young people have no hope since they are too dependent on technology.: This is another extreme overgeneralization ("Everyone feels") and an exaggerated, emotional claim ("no hope"). It is not an effective reason because it is hyperbolic, unsupported, and appeals to sentiment rather than reason or evidence, which would undermine the passage's more measured, reportorial tone.
D) All young people know they are more technologically savvy than their parents will ever be.: This is a generalization about youth perception. While it may be true for many, it is a subjective statement about awareness, not a reason supporting the negative impact or pervasive use of technology. It does not address consequences like depression or cyberbullying, nor does it provide evidence of increased usage.
Conclusion:
The most effective supporting reason is one that extends the passage's evidence-based approach. A recent study documenting rising screen time due to proliferating forms of technology provides concrete, factual support for the main idea, making B) the best choice.
Extract:
Our survey revealed some eye- opening results about young people and the role technology plays in their lives: technology is the primary focus of young people today. In our survey, 85% of those questioned said they spend their free time using technology in some way. Only 5% claim that they read actual books, 7% hang out with friends, and only 3% do some sort of physical activity. Whether it's looking through social media sites, playing video games, texting friends, or surfing the web, our youth spends an inordinate amount of time on screens. The days of hanging with friends, being outside in nature, and reading a good book for fun seem to be long gone. Natalie Greenburg, clinical psychologist from the Perkins Institute, claims that, "Studies have shown a direct correlation between too much screen time and rising depression rates among teens." Greenburg explains screen time has an impact on how individuals view themselves. This is based on the amount of likes someone gets on social media sites or the number of texts someone receives from his or her peers. "The feedback kids get from technology becomes the barometer for their self- worth, which could lead to depression." Cyber bullying is also a big issue with technology. "Kids are able to freely say anything they want behind a screen," Greenburg states,"Since they are bullying from a keyboard, kids are no longer exposed to social cues like facial expressions and body language, which may stop the behavior. As a result, cyber bullying has become rampant, which has led to more depression." Technology is here to stay and it is only going to become more entrenched in our society. It will continue to impact our youth in ways we can't even fathom.
The author most likely included Natalie Greenburg's comments in order to:
A.
explain the effects that technology is having on young people.
B. add an emotional component to the statistical information presented.
C. appeal to the reader's reason by adding statistical data to back up an opinion.
D. distract readers by tricking them into believing the argument is not sufficiently supported.
Rationale
The author included the expert's comments to explain the effects of technology on young people.
Authors include expert testimony to add credibility, depth, and explanation to their discussion. The first paragraph of the passage presents statistical data about how much young people use technology. Natalie Greenburg, a clinical psychologist, is then quoted to address the so what?, the psychological and social effects of that high usage. Her comments provide a professional explanation for the potential consequences (depression, self-worth issues, cyberbullying) hinted at by the statistics.
A) explain the effects that technology is having on young people.: This is correct. Greenburg's quotes directly describe the mechanisms ("feedback... becomes the barometer for self-worth") and outcomes ("direct correlation... with rising depression rates," "cyber bullying has become rampant... led to more depression") that result from the technology usage documented in the first paragraph. She moves the discussion from description to analysis.
B) add an emotional component to the statistical information presented.: While the topic of depression and bullying is emotional, Greenburg's comments are delivered in a professional, clinical tone. She cites "studies" and explains psychological mechanisms. The primary function is explanatory and authoritative, not primarily to evoke an emotional response. The statistics themselves (only 3% active) might provoke more emotion than her analysis.
C) appeal to the reader's reason by adding statistical data to back up an opinion.: Greenburg's comments do not add new statistical data; she refers to studies but does not present numbers. Her role is to interpret and give context to the data and trends already presented, not to supply more data. She provides expert reasoning, not additional statistics.
D) distract readers by tricking them into believing the argument is not sufficiently supported.: This makes no sense strategically. Authors do not typically include credible expert quotes to weaken or distract from their own argument. Greenburg's comments directly support and elaborate on the passage's concerns, strengthening the argument, not undermining it.
Conclusion:
The expert testimony serves to bridge the gap between raw data (usage statistics) and the passage's implied concern about negative impacts. Therefore, the author included Greenburg's comments primarily to A) explain the effects that technology is having on young people.
Extract:
Manny looked out the window. "Not yet," he mumbled to himself. He walked into the kitchen to try to distract himself. He was about to open the cookie jar when he heard a car motor. "Now?" he ran to the window. "Ugh," he sighed, "it is just Mr. Mendez." Suddenly he saw it. The small, white truck he was searching for. He burst through the door and breathlessly greeted Stanley. Stanley smiled as he handed a stack of envelopes to Manny. "Is this what you're looking for, son?" Stanley said with a smile. Manny looked at the return address. Michigan State University. "Yes! Thank you!" Manny cried as he bolted into his house. "Good luck, Manny!" Stanley yelled after him.
From the text above, you can infer that Manny is:
A.
best friends with Stanley.
B. anxiously awaiting the mail.
C. very hard on himself.
D. not a fan of Mr. Mendez.
Rationale
You can infer that Manny is anxiously awaiting the mail.
An inference is a conclusion drawn from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements. Manny's actions and words form a clear pattern: repeatedly looking out the window, mumbling "Not yet," being easily distracted from a cookie, running to the window at any car sound, sighing with disappointment at the wrong truck, and finally bursting out the door when the correct mail truck arrives. This sequence of restless, anticipatory behavior strongly points to a state of anxious waiting for a specific delivery.
A) best friends with Stanley.: While Manny greets Stanley breathlessly and Stanley acts kindly, the text does not provide enough evidence to infer a "best friends" relationship. Stanley's paternal tone ("son") and well-wishing suggest a friendly, possibly familiar relationship (like a regular mail carrier), but "best friends" is too strong an inference from this brief, focused interaction.
B) anxiously awaiting the mail.: This is strongly supported by the evidence. His repeated checking, self-talk, distraction attempt, and dramatic reaction upon seeing the truck all depict anxiety and eager anticipation focused on the mail's arrival. The climax, finding the university envelope, confirms what he was waiting for.
C) very hard on himself.: There is no evidence Manny is being self-critical. He mumbles "Not yet" in frustration at the situation, not self-blame. His actions show impatience, not a negative self-assessment.
D) not a fan of Mr. Mendez.: Manny sighs "Ugh" when he sees it's Mr. Mendez, but this is likely because Mr. Mendez is not the mail carrier he's waiting for, not because he dislikes the man personally. The sigh expresses disappointment in the moment, not a general personal aversion.
Conclusion:
Manny's focused, agitated behavior from the beginning to the end of the passage clearly indicates he is in a state of suspenseful expectation about the mail, allowing us to infer he is B) anxiously awaiting the mail.
Extract:
Manny looked out the window. "Not yet," he mumbled to himself. He walked into the kitchen to try to distract himself. He was about to open the cookie jar when he heard a car motor. "Now?" he ran to the window. "Ugh," he sighed, "it is just Mr. Mendez." Suddenly he saw it. The small, white truck he was searching for. He burst through the door and breathlessly greeted Stanley. Stanley smiled as he handed a stack of envelopes to Manny. "Is this what you're looking for, son?" Stanley said with a smile. Manny looked at the return address. Michigan State University. "Yes! Thank you!" Manny cried as he bolted into his house. "Good luck, Manny!" Stanley yelled after him.
Which detail does not provide evidence to back up the conclusion that Manny is eager for the mail to come?
A.
He mumbles "not yet" to himself.
B. He is about to open the cookie jar.
C. He sighs when he sees Mr. Mendez.
D. He bursts through the door and greets Stanley.
Rationale
The detail about him opening the cookie jar does not provide evidence for his eagerness.
To support the conclusion that Manny is eager for the mail, a detail must be directly linked to his anticipation or reaction to the mail's arrival. Details about other actions can be related if they are interrupted or influenced by his focus on the mail. The cookie jar detail shows an attempt at distraction, but without further context linking it to his waiting, it is neutral evidence.
A) He mumbles "not yet" to himself.: This is direct evidence. The phrase "not yet" is a verbal expression of impatience and repeated checking, showing he is actively monitoring for the mail's arrival and is disappointed it hasn't come.
B) He is about to open the cookie jar.: This detail, on its own, does not provide evidence for eagerness about the mail. It shows he is trying to find a distraction ("to try to distract himself"). The attempt to distract actually implies he is too eager and needs to occupy his mind. However, the action itself (reaching for a cookie) is not a sign of eagerness for the mail; it's a sign of attempted diversion from that eagerness. It's the weakest direct link.
C) He sighs when he sees Mr. Mendez.: This is strong evidence. The sigh is a vocalization of disappointment upon realizing the arriving vehicle is not the mail truck. It shows he is keyed up to identify the correct vehicle and is let down when it's the wrong one, directly relating to his eager anticipation.
D) He bursts through the door and greets Stanley.: This is the most dramatic evidence. "Bursts through the door" indicates impulsive, hurried action driven by excitement upon finally seeing the mail truck. It physically demonstrates his eagerness.
Conclusion:
While the cookie jar moment occurs within the context of his anxious wait, the action itself is not a manifestation of eagerness but an attempt to cope with it. Therefore, the detail that does not directly provide evidence for his eagerness is B) He is about to open the cookie jar.
Extract:
Manny looked out the window. "Not yet," he mumbled to himself. He walked into the kitchen to try to distract himself. He was about to open the cookie jar when he heard a car motor. "Now?" he ran to the window. "Ugh," he sighed, "it is just Mr. Mendez." Suddenly he saw it. The small, white truck he was searching for. He burst through the door and breathlessly greeted Stanley. Stanley smiled as he handed a stack of envelopes to Manny. "Is this what you're looking for, son?" Stanley said with a smile. Manny looked at the return address. Michigan State University. "Yes! Thank you!" Manny cried as he bolted into his house. "Good luck, Manny!" Stanley yelled after him.
Which detail from the text supports the inference that Stanley knows Manny pretty well?
A.
He drives up in his truck.
B. He hands him a stack of envelopes.
C. He asks if an envelope is what he is looking for.
D. He smiles at Manny.
Rationale
Stanley asking if an envelope is what he is looking for supports the inference he knows Manny well.
An inference about a relationship is supported by details that show personal knowledge or familiarity beyond a routine, impersonal interaction. A mail carrier handing over mail is standard. However, a mail carrier who is aware of a specific, important piece of mail a teenager is expecting and verbally acknowledges it demonstrates a personal awareness of the customer's life and concerns.
A) He drives up in his truck.: This is simply his job. It indicates his role as a mail carrier, not his personal relationship with Manny.
B) He hands him a stack of envelopes.: This is the basic function of a mail carrier delivering mail. It does not, by itself, suggest any special familiarity.
C) He asks if an envelope is what he is looking for.: This question shows that Stanley is not just performing a generic duty. He is aware that Manny is specifically waiting for something important. He has likely observed Manny's anxious behavior previously or knows about Manny's college applications. This personal attention and knowledge suggest a friendly relationship and that Stanley knows Manny "pretty well."
D) He smiles at Manny.: A smile is a common, friendly gesture. While it suggests a cordial relationship, it is not as strong an indicator of specific personal knowledge as the pointed question about the awaited envelope.
Conclusion:
The question about the specific envelope implies prior awareness of Manny's situation, going beyond routine service. This detail best supports the inference that C) Stanley knows Manny pretty well.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
What is the purpose of the first paragraph of Passage 1?
A.
To inform
B. To distract
C. To persuade
D. To entertain
Rationale
The purpose of the first paragraph of Passage 1 is to inform.
The primary function of the text determines the author's purpose. The first paragraph of Passage 1 presents historical and factual information about electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a neutral, explanatory tone.
A) To inform: This paragraph serves an expository function. It provides key facts: the decade ECT was pioneered (1930s), the conditions it treated, a basic description of the procedure, historical reasons for controversy (pain, memory loss), a key cultural event that shaped public perception (Kesey's novel), and a note on concurrent medical advances. The tone is objective and educational, aiming to increase the reader's knowledge about ECT's history and public image.
B) To distract: A distracting purpose would imply the text is trying to lead the reader away from a main point or issue. This paragraph is central to the passage's aim of providing context; it is not a diversion but a foundation.
C) To persuade: While the larger passage has persuasive elements, this first paragraph is primarily factual. It sets up the history but does not, in itself, argue for or against ECT. It explains why controversy exists, but doesn't tell the reader what to think about it yet.
D) To entertain: The paragraph is written in a straightforward, informational style. It does not use humor, suspense, vivid narrative, or other literary devices primarily designed to amuse or engage the reader for enjoyment. Its goal is understanding, not entertainment.
Conclusion:
The first paragraph is structured to deliver historical and factual context about ECT. Its language is descriptive and neutral, prioritizing the transfer of information. Therefore, A) To inform is its primary purpose.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
What is the purpose of the second paragraph of Passage 1?
A.
To inform
B. To distract
C. To persuade
D. To entertain
Rationale
The purpose of the second paragraph of Passage 1 is to persuade.
The second paragraph shifts from historical context to a discussion of ECT's current status and makes recommendations. Its language moves into the realm of opinion and advocacy.
A) To inform: It does contain informational elements (e.g., ECT remains an option, public opposition persists). However, these facts are framed within a larger argument. The paragraph goes beyond stating facts to prescribing actions ("should be especially careful") and making a judgment about patient behavior ("unfortunately").
B) To distract: The paragraph continues and develops the passage's central theme; it is not a tangential diversion.
C) To persuade: This is the dominant purpose. The author is making an argument: despite public opposition (a problem), ECT is a valid treatment for some (a position). To manage this, the author urges a specific course of action for professionals ("should be especially careful to make clear distinctions") and implicitly criticizes those who "rely on fiction rather than fact." This is persuasive language aimed at influencing the reader's view of ECT and the behavior of both doctors and patients.
D) To entertain: Like the first paragraph, the style remains expository and serious, not designed for amusement.
Conclusion:
The second paragraph uses facts to support a specific viewpoint and to recommend professional conduct. Its imperative and evaluative language ("should be," "unfortunately") reveals a persuasive intent. Thus, C) To persuade is its primary purpose.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
What is the primary purpose of Passage 2?
A.
To inform
B. To distract
C. To persuade
D. To entertain
Rationale
The primary purpose of Passage 2 is to entertain.
Passage 2 is a short, first-person narrative that relates a personal and emotionally charged experience. Its features are characteristic of storytelling.
A) To inform: While the reader learns about one person's negative encounter with ECT proposals, the passage is not structured to educate about ECT objectively. It provides a single, subjective perspective filled with emotional language and imagery, not balanced information.
B) To distract: The passage is a self-contained unit (a narrative vignette); it isn't diverting attention from another text.
C) To persuade: The narrative is powerfully biased and could certainly influence a reader's opinion against ECT. However, its primary purpose is not to construct a logical argument but to relate an experience. Persuasion is a likely effect, but the author's primary intent appears to be sharing a vivid, memorable story.
D) To entertain: The passage employs classic narrative techniques to engage the reader: a clear scene setting ("stark exam room"), dramatic tension (doctors blocking the door), strong characterization ("Big Doctor," "sadistic intentions"), internal monologue, and a quick resolution (escaping the ward). It uses hyperbole ("crackpot brainwashing machine," "wacko ward") and sensory details to create a compelling, emotionally resonant story meant to captivate the reader.
Conclusion:
Passage 2 prioritizes narrative engagement, emotional impact, and stylistic flair over balanced exposition or structured argument. Its primary purpose is D) To entertain through storytelling.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
With which statement would the author of Passage 1 likely agree?
A.
Patients who suffer from mental illness should sue Ken Kesey for libel.
B. Electroconvulsive therapy is a ready solution for every psychiatric complaint.
C. No twenty-first century patient should ever receive electroconvulsive therapy.
D. Medical patients should try options such as medication before electroconvulsive therapy.
Rationale
The author of Passage 1 would likely agree that patients should try medication before electroconvulsive therapy.
To infer the author's agreement, we must synthesize the views expressed in Passage 1. The author presents ECT as a serious medical procedure with a fraught history but legitimate modern use under specific conditions.
A) Patients who have mental illness should sue Ken Kesey for libel. The author mentions Kesey's novel as a factor in ECT's fall from public favor but does not express anger toward Kesey or suggest legal action. The tone is explanatory, not litigious.
B) Electroconvulsive therapy is a ready solution for every psychiatric complaint. This contradicts the passage directly. The author states ECT is for "severe psychiatric symptoms" and is a "genuine option for...patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication." This frames it as a specialized, last-resort treatment, not a universal or first-line solution.
C) No twenty-first-century patient should ever receive electroconvulsive therapy. This is the opposite of the author's stated position. The author explicitly says it "remains a genuine option," indicating belief in its appropriate, modern use for some patients.
D) Medical patients should try options such as medication before electroconvulsive therapy. The text strongly supports this. The author specifies ECT is for patients "whose symptoms do not improve with medication." This logical sequence, trying medication first, is implicit in that phrasing. The author's caution about distinguishing "myth and reality" also suggests a careful, stepped approach to treatment, not an immediate jump to ECT.
Conclusion:
The author of Passage 1 portrays ECT as a valid but serious intervention reserved for cases where other treatments (like medication) have failed. D) Medical patients should try options such as medication before electroconvulsive therapy logically aligns with this cautious, sequential view of treatment options.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
Which detail from Passage 1 supports the conclusion that patients should try other options before electing to undergo electroconvulsive therapy?
A.
This procedure...was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss.
B. Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest...featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients.
C. Electroconvulsive therapy...remains a genuine option for patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication.
D. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane.
Rationale
The detail that ECT is for patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication supports trying other options first.
We are looking for the detail that most directly implies a sequence of treatment. Support for the idea of trying other options first would be text that establishes ECT's place in a treatment hierarchy.
A) This procedure...was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. This detail explains the historical source of ECT's bad reputation. It discusses past risks but does not comment on the order in which treatments should be tried today.
B) Ken Kesey's novel...featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. This detail explains a cultural reason for public distrust. It addresses perception, not medical protocol or treatment sequencing.
C) Electroconvulsive therapy...remains a genuine option for patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. This is the pivotal supporting detail. The phrase "whose symptoms do not improve with medication" establishes a clear conditional relationship. It defines the patient group for whom ECT is appropriate as those for whom a first-line treatment (medication) has been tried and found insufficient. This directly supports the conclusion that medication (as an example of "other options") should be attempted first.
D) Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. This detail adds nuance to the history, explaining that ECT improved even as its public image worsened. It addresses safety evolution but, like option A, does not establish a treatment sequence.
Conclusion:
The detail that defines ECT's modern role based on prior treatment failure provides the strongest logical support for a stepped-care approach. C) Electroconvulsive therapy...remains a genuine option for patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication is the correct answer.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
The author of Passage 1 would most likely criticize the author of Passage 2 for:
A.
failing to listen to the doctor's explanations.
B. making no attempt to protect her ailing mother.
C. feeling threatened by her physical circumstances.
D. asking too many questions and wasting the doctor's time.
Rationale
The author of Passage 1 would criticize the Passage 2 author for failing to listen to the doctor's explanations.
This requires inferring the values and arguments of the first author and applying them to the behavior described in the second passage. The author of Passage 1 emphasizes informed decision-making based on facts over fiction.
A) failing to listen to the doctor's explanations. Passage 2 states: "Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it." The author of Passage 1, who laments that "many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact," would see this as a primary failure. By not listening, the narrator ensures their understanding remains based on fear ("brainwashing machine," "stick wires in her ears") rather than medical reality. This directly contravenes Passage 1's plea for clear doctor-patient communication to dispel myth.
B) making no attempt to protect her ailing mother. The narrator in Passage 2 does protect the mother by ultimately fleeing the situation. From a clinical perspective, Passage 1's author might question if this was the right protection, but the narrative shows clear protective intent ("I grabbed Mama and beat it out").
C) feeling threatened by her physical circumstances. Passage 1's author is focused on information and myth. While they might understand the fear, their criticism would likely center on the reaction to that fear (not gathering facts) rather than the feeling itself.
D) asking too many questions and wasting the doctor's time. Passage 2 shows the opposite: the narrator mumbles "something noncommittal" and asks no questions. Passage 1's author would likely advocate for more questions to clarify facts, not fewer.
Conclusion:
The core of Passage 1's argument is the necessity of replacing fictionalized fear with factual understanding. The narrator of Passage 2 actively avoids receiving factual explanations. Therefore, the author of Passage 1 would most criticize A) failing to listen to the doctor's explanations.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
The author of Passage 1 would most likely criticize the doctor in Passage 2 for:
A.
revealing medical information to the patient's family members.
B. denying the patient and her family the chance to ask questions.
C. taking control of the meeting instead of letting underlings speak.
D. neglecting to anticipate the feelings of his patient and her family.
Rationale
The author of Passage 1 would criticize the doctor in Passage 2 for neglecting to anticipate the family's feelings.
We must apply Passage 1's recommended standards for medical professionals to the doctor's ("Big Doctor") conduct as depicted in Passage 2. Passage 1 urges doctors to be "especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality."
A) revealing medical information to the patient's family members. The doctor is speaking to the narrator, presumably a family member, about the mother's treatment. This is standard practice and not inherently criticized in Passage 1.
B) denying the patient and her family the chance to ask questions. The text says the doctor "asked if I had questions." He technically offered the opportunity, though the setting was intimidating. His failure was in effectiveness, not in the denial of the chance.
C) taking control of the meeting instead of letting underlings speak. Passage 1 does not discuss hierarchy or meeting control. Its concern is with communication quality, not who does the speaking.
D) neglecting to anticipate the feelings of his patient and her family. This is the strongest critique based on Passage 1's principles. The author of Passage 1 understands that ECT is shrouded in public fear and "myth." A careful professional, per Passage 1, would anticipate this anxiety. The doctor in Passage 2 operates in a way that maximizes fear: a "stark exam room," three doctors blocking the door, a blunt declaration ("needed electroshock"). He makes no apparent effort to empathize, reassure, or counter the prevalent cultural myths that the narrator clearly believes. His approach guarantees the "fiction" will prevail over "fact," which is exactly what Passage 1's author warns against.
Conclusion:
Passage 1 advocates for sensitive, myth-dispelling communication about ECT. The doctor in Passage 2 conducts himself in a manner that inflames fear and misunderstanding. Thus, the author of Passage 1 would likely criticize him for D) neglecting to anticipate the feelings of his patient and her family.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
Which details from Passage 2 suggest that the author has a negative outlook about medical professionals?
A.
She describes feeling trapped in a room by doctors, one of whom she calls 'sadistic.'
B. She describes feeling outnumbered when she makes reasoned arguments to a doctor she calls 'wacko.'
C. She describes feeling bored by the idea that the doctor wants to 'tie [her] mother down and stick wires in her ears.'
D. She describes feeling excited by the prospect of seeing her mother hooked up to a pseudo-medical 'brainwashing machine.'
Rationale
The detail about feeling trapped and calling a doctor "sadistic" suggests a negative outlook.
A "negative outlook" would be conveyed through language that portrays the doctors as threatening, malicious, incompetent, or absurd. We must find the option where the description aligns with such a view.
A) She describes feeling trapped in a room by doctors, one of whom she calls "sadistic." This option contains two powerfully negative details. The physical description of the doctors positioning themselves to block the door creates an image of intimidation and coercion. The label "sadistic" attributes cruel and pleasure-driven intentions to the doctor, which is a profoundly negative judgment on his character and motives. This strongly suggests a negative outlook.
B) She describes feeling outnumbered when she makes reasoned arguments to a doctor she calls "wacko." This option is partially incorrect. The narrator does call the ward "wacko," but the passage shows her not making "reasoned arguments." She "mumbled something noncommittal" and then fled—the scenario of being outnumbered while arguing is not depicted.
C) She describes feeling bored by the idea... The text does not indicate boredom. The narrator's reaction is one of horror and fear ("All I could think..."), not detachment or boredom.
D) She describes feeling excited by the prospect... The text conveys terror and revulsion, not excitement. The "brainwashing machine" is a fear-driven metaphor, not a source of anticipation.
Conclusion:
The imagery of entrapment and the attribution of sadistic intent are unambiguous signals of a hostile and fearful view of the medical professionals present. A) She describes feeling trapped in a room by doctors, one of whom she calls "sadistic," is the correct answer.
Extract:
Passage 1 Electroconvulsive therapy was pioneered in the 1930s as a method for combatting severe psychiatric symptoms such as intractable depression and paranoid schizophrenia. This procedure, which involves delivering a deliberate electrical shock to the brain, was controversial from the beginning because it caused pain and short-term memory loss. It fell strongly out of public favor after the 1962 publication of Ken Kesey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which featured an unprincipled nurse using electroconvulsive therapy as a means of control over her patients. Paradoxically, medical advances at the time of the novel's publication made electroconvulsive therapy significantly safer and more humane. Although the public is still generally opposed to electroconvulsive therapy, it remains a genuine option for psychiatric patients whose symptoms do not improve with medication. Medical professionals who offer this option should be especially careful to make clear distinctions between myth and reality. On this topic, unfortunately, many patients tend to rely on fiction rather than fact. Passage 2 We were led into a stark exam room, where three doctors positioned themselves so Mama and I had no direct path to the door. The one in charge cleared his throat and told me my mother needed electroshock. My brain buzzed almost as if it was hooked up to some crackpot brainwashing machine as Big Doctor droned on about his sadistic intentions. I didn't hear any of it. All I could think was that these people wanted to tie my mother down and stick wires in her ears. When Big Doctor was finished, he flipped through the papers on his clipboard and asked if I had questions. I mumbled something noncommittal. Then, when he and his silent escort left, I grabbed Mama and beat it out of that wacko ward as fast as I could make her go
The author of Passage 1 supports her points primarily by:
A.
telling humanizing stories.
B. relying on facts and logic.
C. pointing to expert sources.
D. using fear tactics and manipulation.
Rationale
The author of Passage 1 supports her points primarily by relying on facts and logic.
We must identify the primary rhetorical strategy or mode of support used in Passage 1. The passage is expository and persuasive, aiming to build a credible case.
A) telling humanizing stories. Passage 1 contains no personal anecdotes or character-driven narratives. It deals in historical trends, procedural facts, and general statements about public and patient behavior. Passage 2 uses this technique.
B) relying on facts and logic. This is the core of Passage 1's method. It presents factual claims (historical dates, medical effects like memory loss, and the publication of a novel) and uses logical connections. For example, it notes the paradox of safety improving while public perception worsens. It is reasoned that because myths persist, doctors must work to dispel them. The argument for ECT as a last-resort option is based on the logical premise of stepped care (try medication first).
C) pointing to expert sources. The passage does not cite specific studies, name medical authorities, or reference professional organizations. Its references are to a historical procedure and a work of fiction, not to expert testimony or consensus.
D) using fear tactics and manipulation. The tone is measured and objective, not alarmist. It acknowledges public fear but doesn't use emotionally manipulative language to instill fear in the reader. Its goal is to address existing concerns, not create new ones rationally.
Conclusion:
Passage 1 builds its case through the presentation of historical and clinical facts, which it connects through clear, reasoned analysis. Its persuasive power derives from this factual, logical foundation. Therefore, the author supports points primarily by B) relying on facts and logic.
Extract:
As a parent, I find television and movie rating systems unhelpful. Ratings systems are not human. Their scores are based on numbers: how many bad words, how many gory scenes. To me, that makes no sense. Nobody else knows my kids like I do, so nobody else can say what's okay for them to watch. In my experience, the content a government organization rates as PG or PG-13 may or may not be appropriate for my 9-, 14-, and 16-year-olds. My youngest is quite mature for his age, and I'm fine with him hearing a bad word or two as a part of a meaningful story. Violence concerns me more. I won't let even my 16-year-old watch frivolous violence or horror. But I don't shelter him from realistic violence. My little guy still has to stay out of the room for the bloody stuff. But eventually, kids need to know what's out there.
The primary purpose of this passage is to:
A.
decide
B. inform
C. persuade
D. entertain
Rationale
The primary purpose of this passage is to persuade.
The author is presenting a personal viewpoint and arguing for its validity, aiming to influence the reader's thoughts on rating systems.
A) decide: This is not a purpose of writing. An author may describe a decision, but the text itself doesn't "decide."
B) inform: While the passage informs us of the author's opinions and parenting style, that information is presented in service of a larger argument. The core drive is not merely to share data but to convince the reader of a position: that impersonal rating systems are inferior to personalized parental judgment.
C) persuade: This is evident throughout. The author states a strong opinion ("unhelpful," "makes no sense"), provides reasons (ratings are not human, based on numbers, can't know individual kids), offers personal examples to support the argument, and contrasts their nuanced approach with the blunt instrument of ratings. The goal is to persuade the reader to see the limitations of standardized ratings.
D) entertain: The passage is written in a conversational but earnest style. It may engage readers who are parents, but its primary aim is advocacy, not amusement or storytelling.
Conclusion:
The passage is a personal editorial or argumentative essay. Its structure and language serve to convince the audience of the author's thesis about rating systems, making C) persuade the primary purpose.
Extract:
As a parent, I find television and movie rating systems unhelpful. Ratings systems are not human. Their scores are based on numbers: how many bad words, how many gory scenes. To me, that makes no sense. Nobody else knows my kids like I do, so nobody else can say what's okay for them to watch. In my experience, the content a government organization rates as PG or PG-13 may or may not be appropriate for my 9-, 14-, and 16-year-olds. My youngest is quite mature for his age, and I'm fine with him hearing a bad word or two as a part of a meaningful story. Violence concerns me more. I won't let even my 16-year-old watch frivolous violence or horror. But I don't shelter him from realistic violence. My little guy still has to stay out of the room for the bloody stuff. But eventually, kids need to know what's out there.
The author of this passage would be most likely to agree that:
A.
kids should not watch television or movies at all until they are in their teens.
B. government rating systems should have more levels to make them more useful.
C. it is never appropriate to prevent any human being from watching any show or movie.
D. another parent should have the right to let her own kids watch extremely violent movies.
Rationale
The author would most likely agree that another parent has the right to let their own kids watch extremely violent movies.
We must infer the author's broader principles from the stated views. The central principle is parental autonomy and individualized judgment.
A) kids should not watch television or movies at all until they are in their teens. The author discusses letting children of various ages watch content, making rules about violence, etc. They clearly allow screen time, so this extreme view contradicts the passage.
B) government rating systems should have more levels to make them more useful. The author's critique is more fundamental. They don't argue that ratings are useful but imprecise; they argue the entire approach ("based on numbers") makes no sense because it can't account for individual maturity and context. Adding more levels wouldn't solve this core objection about impersonal quantification.
C) it is never appropriate to prevent any human being from watching any show or movie. The author explicitly makes rules: the 16-year-old can't watch "frivolous violence or horror," and the 9-year-old must "stay out of the room for the bloody stuff." The author believes in prevention based on judgment.
D) another parent should have the right to let her own kids watch extremely violent movies. This aligns with the author's core philosophy: "Nobody else knows my kids as I do, so nobody else can say what's okay for them to watch." By extension, the author would logically grant that other parents, knowing their own kids, have the same right to make their own decisions, even if those decisions differ. This reflects a belief in parental sovereignty.
Conclusion:
The author's argument is founded on the unique knowledge of each parent. Consistency would require applying this principle to other parents as well. Therefore, the author would most agree with D).
Extract:
As a parent, I find television and movie rating systems unhelpful. Ratings systems are not human. Their scores are based on numbers: how many bad words, how many gory scenes. To me, that makes no sense. Nobody else knows my kids like I do, so nobody else can say what's okay for them to watch. In my experience, the content a government organization rates as PG or PG-13 may or may not be appropriate for my 9-, 14-, and 16-year-olds. My youngest is quite mature for his age, and I'm fine with him hearing a bad word or two as a part of a meaningful story. Violence concerns me more. I won't let even my 16-year-old watch frivolous violence or horror. But I don't shelter him from realistic violence. My little guy still has to stay out of the room for the bloody stuff. But eventually, kids need to know what's out there.
The author of this passage would be likely to support an effort to:
A.
create a government system to recommend ages for reading children's books.
B. prevent kids from attending movies in the theater without their parents' presence.
C. provide parents more information about the content of children's shows and movies.
D. change the age for watching PG-13 movies down to 10 because today's kids are more savvy.
Rationale
The author would likely support an effort to provide parents more information about content.
The author values detailed, contextual information to make personal judgments, while opposing one-size-fits-all age labels.
A) create a government system to recommend ages for reading children's books. This is analogous to the movie rating system the author finds "unhelpful." The author would likely oppose another government age-recommendation system for the same reasons.
B) prevent kids from attending movies in the theater without their parents' presence. The author's focus is on what kids watch, not necessarily where they watch it or with whom. There's no argument in the passage about parental presence at theaters.
C) provide parents more information about the content of children's shows and movies. This directly supports the author's desired approach. The author dislikes ratings because they reduce content to numbers/ages. More descriptive information about content (e.g., "contains realistic war violence," "includes two uses of strong language in an emotional context") would empower parents to apply their own standards, which is exactly what the author does when differentiating between "frivolous violence" and "realistic violence."
D) change the age for watching PG-13 movies down to 10 because today's kids are more savvy. The author's problem isn't with the specific age on the label; it's with the concept of a standardized age label itself. Adjusting the number doesn't address the fundamental critique that no single age fits all children.
Conclusion:
The author wants tools that enable personalized decision-making, not different blanket rules. More detailed content information serves that goal, so C) is the effort they would support.
Extract:
As a parent, I find television and movie rating systems unhelpful. Ratings systems are not human. Their scores are based on numbers: how many bad words, how many gory scenes. To me, that makes no sense. Nobody else knows my kids like I do, so nobody else can say what's okay for them to watch. In my experience, the content a government organization rates as PG or PG-13 may or may not be appropriate for my 9-, 14-, and 16-year-olds. My youngest is quite mature for his age, and I'm fine with him hearing a bad word or two as a part of a meaningful story. Violence concerns me more. I won't let even my 16-year-old watch frivolous violence or horror. But I don't shelter him from realistic violence. My little guy still has to stay out of the room for the bloody stuff. But eventually, kids need to know what's out there.
What is the most likely reason for the author's decision to include the phrase 'as a parent' at the beginning?
A.
This phrase provides a reason to support her opinion.
B. She is implying that non-parents cannot know what kids need.
C. This phrase provides a transition from the points she made earlier.
D. She is establishing herself as a knowledgeable source on this topic.
Rationale
The author begins with "as a parent" to establish herself as a knowledgeable source.
The opening phrase "As a parent..." functions as an appeal to ethos, establishing the writer's credibility and perspective on the subject of children and media.
A) This phrase provides a reason to support her opinion. The phrase itself is not the reason; the reason is the experience and insight that comes from being a parent. The phrase announces the source of that authority.
B) She is implying that non-parents cannot know what kids need. This is a possible implication, but it's not the primary rhetorical purpose. The main goal is to build her own credibility, not to explicitly devalue others. The phrase focuses on her qualification, not the disqualification of others.
C) This phrase provides a transition from the points she made earlier. This is the first sentence of the passage; there are no earlier points to transition from.
D) She is establishing herself as a knowledgeable source on this topic. This is the standard function of such a phrase. By stating "As a parent," she claims direct, experiential knowledge of raising children and making media decisions for them. This gives weight to her subsequent opinions about rating systems, positioning her not just as a critic but as a stakeholder with relevant expertise.
Conclusion:
In persuasive writing, announcing one's relevant identity or experience is a strategy to gain the reader's trust. The author uses "As a parent" to D) establish herself as a knowledgeable source before criticizing the rating systems.
Extract:
As a parent, I find television and movie rating systems unhelpful. Ratings systems are not human. Their scores are based on numbers: how many bad words, how many gory scenes. To me, that makes no sense. Nobody else knows my kids like I do, so nobody else can say what's okay for them to watch. In my experience, the content a government organization rates as PG or PG-13 may or may not be appropriate for my 9-, 14-, and 16-year-olds. My youngest is quite mature for his age, and I'm fine with him hearing a bad word or two as a part of a meaningful story. Violence concerns me more. I won't let even my 16-year-old watch frivolous violence or horror. But I don't shelter him from realistic violence. My little guy still has to stay out of the room for the bloody stuff. But eventually, kids need to know what's out there.
When the author says ratings systems are 'based on numbers,' she is developing the point that:
A.
logic and reasoning have no place in parenting.
B. the only numbers that matter are her children's ages.
C. some decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.
D. she is not good enough at math to rely on ratings systems.
Rationale
The author is developing the point that some decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.
The phrase "based on numbers" is used pejoratively to contrast with a more nuanced, individualized approach. It's part of her larger argument.
A) logic and reasoning have no place in parenting. The author uses logic and reasoning extensively in the passage. Her objection is to a specific type of logic (quantitative, formulaic) applied to a complex human situation. She doesn't reject logic altogether.
B) the only numbers that matter are her children's ages. She explicitly argues against this. She says her 9-year-old is mature and her 16-year-old has restrictions, showing that chronological age is not her sole determinant.
C) some decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis. This is the point she is developing. By saying ratings are "based on numbers" (i.e., a generic count of swear words or violent acts), she argues they fail to consider the context, the child's individual maturity, and the meaning of the content. Her alternative, described in detail, is a case-by-case evaluation for each child and each piece of content. The "numbers" critique supports this call for individualized judgment.
D) she is not good enough at math to rely on ratings systems. This is a literal and silly misinterpretation. "Based on numbers" is a criticism of the system's reductionism, not an admission of personal inability.
Conclusion:
The author contrasts impersonal, quantitative ratings with her personalized, qualitative method. The "based on numbers" critique supports her overarching argument that C) some decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.
Which word functions as a transition in the sentence below? Cassandra loved reading and writing books as a child. Thus she became an English teacher in her adult life.
A.
Loved
B. Child
C. Thus
D. Became
Rationale
The word "Thus" functions as a transition in the sentence.
A transition word or phrase creates a logical connection between ideas, often between sentences or independent clauses. It explains how one thought leads to or relates to another.
A) Loved
"Loved" is a verb describing Cassandra's past feeling. It is part of the content of the first idea but does not itself connect that idea to the next sentence.
B) Child
"Child" is a noun specifying the time period of the first idea. It provides detail but performs no connective function between the two sentences.
C) Thus
"Thus" is a conjunctive adverb meaning "as a result" or "therefore." It explicitly signals that the second sentence (becoming an English teacher) is a logical consequence or outcome of the first sentence (loving reading and writing). It is the word that forges the cause-and-effect relationship between the two independent statements.
D) Became
"Became" is the main verb of the second sentence, describing the action Cassandra took. Like "loved," it is part of the content, not the connector.
Conclusion:
The word that serves the transitional function by linking the cause (childhood passion) to the effect (adult career) is Thus.
Which word functions as a transition in the sentences below? However you celebrate the holidays, it's a time to spend with your family. It's also a time to enjoy some good food!
A.
However
B. Time
C. Also
D. Some
Rationale
The word "Also" functions as a transition in the sentences.
It is crucial to distinguish between words that are used as content words within a clause and words that actively link ideas across sentences. In this case, "however" is not functioning as a contrasting transition.
A) However
In this sentence, "however" is not used as a contrastive transition between sentences. It is part of an adverbial clause, "However you celebrate the holidays," meaning "No matter how you celebrate the holidays" or "In whatever way you celebrate." It introduces a condition for the first sentence but does not connect the first sentence to the second.
B) Time
"Time" is a noun, the subject complement in the first sentence ("it's a time") and part of the subject in the second ("It's also a time"). It is a repeated keyword, but repetition alone does not make it a transitional device. It does not explain the relationship between the two ideas.
C) Also
"Also" is an additive adverb that functions as a transition. It indicates that the idea in the second sentence ("enjoy some good food") is an additional, related point to the idea in the first sentence ("spend with your family"). It explicitly links the two sentences by showing they are both items in a list of what the holiday time represents.
D) Some
"Some" is an adjective modifying "good food." It specifies an indefinite quantity and is purely a content word within the noun phrase, with no connective role.
Conclusion:
The word that actively transitions from one sentence to the next by adding another element to a shared theme is Also.
Extract:
Dear Mr. O'Hara, I am writing to let you know how much of a positive impact you have made on our daughter. Before being in your algebra class, Violet was math phobic. She would shut down when new concepts would not come to her easily. As a result, she did not pass many tests. Despite this past struggle, she has blossomed in your class! Your patience and dedication have made all the difference in the world. Above all, your one-on-one sessions with her have truly helped her in ways you cannot imagine. She is a more confident and capable math student, thanks to you. We cannot thank you enough. Fondly, Bridgette Foster
Which adjective best describes the tone of this passage?
A.
Arrogant
B. Hopeless
C. Friendly
D. Appreciative
Rationale
The tone of the passage is appreciative.
Tone is the author's attitude toward the subject and audience, conveyed through word choice and content. This is a personal letter from a parent to a teacher.
A) Arrogant
Arrogance involves an off-putting sense of superiority or self-importance. The author, Bridgette Foster, humbly credits the teacher for her daughter's transformation. She expresses gratitude, not superiority. The tone is deferential and thankful, not arrogant.
B) Hopeless
Hopelessness implies despair and a lack of expectation for improvement. The entire letter recounts a journey from struggle to success. It is filled with positive outcomes ("blossomed," "made all the difference," "more confident and capable"). The tone is hopeful and celebratory, not hopeless.
C) Friendly
While the letter is polite and ends with "Fondly," which suggests warmth, "friendly" is too mild and generic. The core of the letter is not just an amicable conversation; it is a focused, effusive expression of deep thanks for a specific, transformative impact. The tone goes beyond friendliness to profound gratitude.
D) Appreciative
This is the precise descriptor. Every sentence serves to acknowledge and thank the teacher for his positive influence. Keywords and phrases include "positive impact," "made all the difference," "truly helped," "thanks to you," and "We cannot thank you enough." The author's primary attitude is one of heartfelt appreciation and gratitude.
Conclusion:
The dominant and consistent attitude conveyed throughout the letter is one of deep gratitude, making Appreciative the most accurate description of its tone.
Extract:
Dear Mr. O'Hara, I am writing to let you know how much of a positive impact you have made on our daughter. Before being in your algebra class, Violet was math phobic. She would shut down when new concepts would not come to her easily. As a result, she did not pass many tests. Despite this past struggle, she has blossomed in your class! Your patience and dedication have made all the difference in the world. Above all, your one-on-one sessions with her have truly helped her in ways you cannot imagine. She is a more confident and capable math student, thanks to you. We cannot thank you enough. Fondly, Bridgette Foster
Which phrase from the passage has an openly appreciative and warm tone?
A.
I am writing to let you know
B. you have made on our daughter
C. made all the difference
D. We cannot thank you enough
Rationale
The phrase "We cannot thank you enough" has an openly appreciative and warm tone.
While the entire passage is appreciative, some phrases are standard letter-writing conventions, while others are direct, emotionally charged expressions of thanks.
A) I am writing to let you know
This is a standard, formal opening for a letter. It states the purpose but is neutral in tone. It is a procedural phrase, not one loaded with appreciative warmth.
B) you have made on our daughter
This phrase is part of a longer sentence ("...how much of a positive impact you have made on our daughter"). It identifies the subject of the impact. While positive, it is descriptive rather than emotionally expressive on its own.
C) made all the difference
This phrase ("Your patience... have made all the difference in the world") is strongly appreciative. It attributes transformative power to the teacher's actions. It is a high compliment, though it remains somewhat focused on the effect.
D) We cannot thank you enough.
This is the most openly and powerfully appreciative phrase. It is a direct, personal statement from the authors to the recipient. It uses hyperbole ("cannot... enough") to express that their gratitude exceeds what words can convey. It is warm, personal, and unreservedly thankful.
Conclusion:
The phrase that most directly and emphatically communicates limitless gratitude in a warm, personal manner is We cannot thank you enough.
Extract:
Dear Mr. O'Hara, I am writing to let you know how much of a positive impact you have made on our daughter. Before being in your algebra class, Violet was math phobic. She would shut down when new concepts would not come to her easily. As a result, she did not pass many tests. Despite this past struggle, she has blossomed in your class! Your patience and dedication have made all the difference in the world. Above all, your one-on-one sessions with her have truly helped her in ways you cannot imagine. She is a more confident and capable math student, thanks to you. We cannot thank you enough. Fondly, Bridgette Foster
A teacher receiving a note like this would likely feel:
A.
annoyed.
B. grateful.
C. indifferent.
D. defensive.
Rationale
A teacher receiving this note would likely feel grateful.
This question requires inference about the emotional impact of the letter's content and tone on its intended recipient, Mr. O'Hara.
A) Annoyed.
Annoyance arises from irritation or bother. The letter is pure praise and thanks, with no criticism, demands, or burdensome requests. There is no content that would logically provoke annoyance in a professional educator.
B) Grateful.
A teacher receiving unsolicited, detailed feedback from a parent about the profound positive impact of their work would most likely feel validated, appreciated, and grateful. The letter acknowledges his specific efforts ("patience," "dedication," "one-on-one sessions") and their successful outcome. Such recognition is a powerful motivator and source of professional satisfaction.
C) Indifferent.
Indifference means lack of interest or concern. A heartfelt, specific testimonial about one's professional efficacy breaking through a student's longstanding fear is not easily dismissed. Such positive reinforcement is typically meaningful to dedicated professionals.
D) Defensive.
Defensiveness is a reaction to perceived criticism or attack. The letter contains no critique whatsoever; it is exclusively complimentary. There is no basis for the teacher to feel defensive.
Conclusion:
Given the letter's effusive praise and expression of deep gratitude for his professional impact, the teacher's most plausible and logical emotional response would be grateful.
Extract:
Dear Mr. O'Hara, I am writing to let you know how much of a positive impact you have made on our daughter. Before being in your algebra class, Violet was math phobic. She would shut down when new concepts would not come to her easily. As a result, she did not pass many tests. Despite this past struggle, she has blossomed in your class! Your patience and dedication have made all the difference in the world. Above all, your one-on-one sessions with her have truly helped her in ways you cannot imagine. She is a more confident and capable math student, thanks to you. We cannot thank you enough. Fondly, Bridgette Foster
The phrase "above all" in the passage is used to:
A.
summarize the letter.
B. introduce a minor point.
C. indicate a sequence.
D. add emphasis to a point.
Rationale
The phrase "above all" is used to add emphasis to a point.
The phrase "above all" is an idiomatic expression used to signal the most important point in a series or discussion.
A) Summarize the letter.
Summarizing phrases include "in conclusion," "to sum up," or "in summary." "Above all" does not summarize preceding points; it highlights one point as supreme among them. The letter continues after this point.
B) Introduce a minor point.
"Above all" does the exact opposite. It is used to single out and introduce the most significant, paramount, or highest-priority point, not a minor one.
C) Indicate a sequence.
Sequential indicators are words like "first," "second," "next," or "finally." "Above all" does not denote position in a sequence; it denotes rank in terms of importance. It means "most importantly," not "next in line."
D) Add emphasis to a point.
This is the correct function. The author lists the teacher's general "patience and dedication" as impactful, then uses "Above all" to place supreme emphasis on a specific practice: "your one-on-one sessions with her." It stresses that this particular action was the most crucial factor in helping the student.
Conclusion:
The phrase "above all" is employed in the passage to add emphasis to a point, elevating the importance of one-on-one sessions above other commendable qualities.
HESI A2 Exams
Biology Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Biology Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Chemistry Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Chemistry Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Anatomy Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Anatomy Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Grammar Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Grammar Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Vocabulary Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Vocabulary Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Physics Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
Physics Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
HESI Quizzes
3 Practice Tests
HESI Quizzes
3 Practice Tests